Tax court help – the information you need to win your tax court case
click here for more images
july 19, 2013 tax court: irs must sign interrogatories under oath, just like taxpayers swanson-flosystems co. V. Commissioner, no. 27975-11 (july 18, 2013): on july 3, 2013, petitioner filed a motion for an order compelling respondent to provide the signed oath required by t.c. Rule 71(c) in answering petitioner’s first set of interrogatories to respondent. On july 16, 2013, respondent filed a response, to which he attached his responses to the → read more
the law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings i came across that quote recently while doing a little internet legal research. It was attributed to a decision of the supreme court in a case cited as hagans v. Lavine, 415 u.s. 533 in the brief where i found it. The brief was on federal jurisdiction, and that sentence → read more
in a previous post i discussed applying for a collections due process hearing (cdph). And emphasized that the irs has the burden of proof concerning penalties. All you really need to do in that case is deny that you filed a frivolous document. The service must prove you did. To do so they must prove all the facts necessary to confirm that you are → read more
a friend of mine, a man deeply involved with the service, sent me an impressive package of research, law, authority, and facts to be considered in his frivolous tax return collections due process hearing (cdp) 1 . He was pla…read more detail
No comments:
Post a Comment